- The Charlottetown and Quebec Conferences of 1864
- Early Advocates of Union in British North America
- Setting the Stage
- The Press
- Maritime Union
- The Charlottetown Conference
- The Quebec Conference
- The Constitutional Project: The Quebec Resolutions
- Economy and Public Finances
- Education, Religion, and Minority Rights
- Opposition to Confederation
Early Advocates of Union in British North America
1806–26
The idea of a general union of the British North American colonies originated with Nova Scotia’s attorney general, Richard John UNIACKE, in 1806:
“In the 1820s he expressed fears that the revolutionary ‘heresies’ of atheism and democracy spreading to the ‘hoards of semi-barbarians’ in the south and west of the United States would engulf New England and then British North America.
“To avert such a catastrophe, Uniacke advocated unions of the Maritime colonies and of the Canadas, beginning in 1806 when he presented a memoir on British North America at the Colonial Office. By 1821, however, he had concluded that only a general union would save the colonies from republicanism, atheism, and democracy, and in 1822 the introduction in the British parliament of a bill to bring about the union of the Canadas spurred him to propose a general union to Frederick John Robinson, president of the Privy Council committee for trade.
“Others in British North America such as Jonathan
1827–41
John George LAMBTON, 1st Earl of Durham, the high commissioner and governor-in-chief of British North America in 1838, addressed the question of union in his 1839 Report on the affairs of British North America:
“After the failure of the Union Bill of 1822, the merchants had asked that Montreal be annexed to Upper Canada, without, however, giving up their basic demand. In his report Durham had sought to recommend solutions to the whole problem of the Canadas, which had been perturbing colonial societies for so long and was reverberating in London. Yet neither the idea of responsible government nor that of a legislative union as he had defined it was accepted by the imperial government. Provided as it was with clauses concerning equal representation, the Union Act of 1840 did not respect the priority of principles set forth by Durham. It is none the less true that the debate in which he had engaged, examining the main points more thoroughly than anyone else before or after him, would not come to an end either in 1841 with the union of Upper and Lower Canada or even in 1848 with the attainment of responsible government.”
1842–58
During the 1850s some Liberal-Conservatives introduced parliamentary resolutions for British North American confederation, and the Reformer George BROWN proposed a federated province of Canada West (Upper Canada; present-day Ontario) and Canada East (Lower Canada; present-day Quebec). But their plans went nowhere. By the early 1860s the prospects for a confederation were far from promising. Alexander Tilloch GALT pressed on:
“Galt had made his acceptance of office in the new ministry conditional upon its adoption of a plan for federation of the British North American colonies. Like others observing the political scene, he was conscious that it was becoming increasingly difficult to maintain the principles of equal representation of Lower and Upper Canada within the union. But he was one of the few who believed that the solution lay in replacing the union based on equality with a federative system in which New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, Newfoundland, Prince Edward Island, and other colonies would participate.… He persuaded his colleagues to make this plan for a federal union an explicit aim of the new government. With the encouragement of Governor
For more information on early advocates for a union of the British North American colonies, please consult the following lists of biographies: